Politics/Amendment Essay

A composed review of the alteration being referred to. What does it say explicitly?  â â â â The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution gives, â€Å"In every criminal arraignment, the blamed will appreciate the privilege to a fast and open preliminary, by a fair jury of the State and region wherein the wrongdoing will have been carried out, which region will have been recently found out by law, and to be educated regarding the nature and reason for the allegation; to be gone up against with the observers against him; to have necessary procedure for getting observers in support of himself, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence† (Sixth Amendment, U.S. Constitution). The rights specified under this correction allude to the arranged privileges of the blamed in criminal indictments. For the most part the Bill of Rights was fused in the Constitution by virtue of the conviction that it was important to restrict the investigatory and prosecutorial forces of the government (Oxford Companion, 2005).  â â â The privileges of the charged in criminal indictment are: â€Å"1) right to an expedient preliminary; 2) right to an open preliminary; 3) right to a preliminary by jury; 4) notice of the allegation; (5) option to defy the contradicting observers; 6) right to mandatory procedure for acquiring ideal observers; and (7) the help of advice or right to counsel† (Oxford Companion, 2005). The privilege to a quick preliminary forestalls harsh detainment before preliminary and guarantees safeguard by the blamed for his motivation. The privilege to an open preliminary goes about as a defend against maltreatment of legal force. In addition, it additionally guarantees the blamed that he is educated for the charges against him. This is a piece of fair treatment (Oxford Companion, 2005). The option to stand up to contradicting observers alludes to one side of the blamed to question said observers. He is additionally qualified for summon observers for his benefit (Oxford Companion, 2005). At last, the denounced is additionally qualified for be spoken to by counsel or a legal counselor. This will be lengthily talked about in another area of this paper. When did it become some portion of the Constitution?  â â â â This correction was endorsed and embraced in the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution in 1791 (Oxford Companion, 2005). It was a piece of the initial ten changes remembered for the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was really proposed by James Madison. The gathering known as Anti-Federalists undermined that if these rights were excluded from the Constitution, their states won't approve the new Constitution. They required away from against the huge forces of government. After a trade off was settled upon, the Constitution was approved in 1789 yet the Bill of Rights was fused later and became effective after it was sanctioned on December 15, 1791 (National Archives site, n.d.). 3. What cases have preceded the Supreme Court wherein this specific correction was applied?  â â â â Before the endorsement of the Sixth Amendment, two resolutions were ordered which as a result concurred the help of insight to those blamed (USGPO site, 2005). The Judiciary Act of 1789 permitted the litigant to argue his case in a government court either by and by or by counsel. Then again, the Act of 1790 permitted the respondent accused of conspiracy or other capital wrongdoing to be protected by counsel which the court will dole out to him (USGPO site, 2005). Indeed, even with the confirmation of the Sixth Amendment, the option to guide has restricted application. It was uniquely during the 1930s that the Supreme Court created and extended the extent of the Sixth Amendment by goodness of law.  â â â â For the situation of Powell v. Alabama, the Court put aside the feelings of eight energetic wrongdoers since the preliminary was directed in a hurried way and the respondents were not helped by counsel. The Court additionally decided that there was refusal of fair treatment believing that the option to be heard is good for nothing in the event that it didn't involve the option to be heard by counsel [287 U.S. 45 (1932)]. The Court concisely clarified that regardless of whether a man is keen and learned he may not be talented in the study of law and might be prosecuted on an incorrect charge or be sentenced dependent on uncouth proof. All the more along these lines, the respondents who are youthful, indigents, unskilled people and are confronted with an environment of threatening vibe away from their family members [287 U.S. 45 (1932)]. In this way, it was focused on that it is basic to be spoken to by insight and it forces an obligation upon the Court, regardless of whether mentioned or not to choose and allot a guidance else, it gets commensurate to a disavowal of fair treatment [287 U.S. 45 (1932)]. On account of Johnson v. Zerbst, the Court articulated the outright guideline of naming advice for all government criminal respondents. In addition, it decided that a waiver of such right should be clear and can't be assumed from quietness of the litigant [304 U.S. 458 (1938)].  â â â â For the situation of Betts v. Brady and Progeny, the Court decided that â€Å"the arrangement of insight is definitely not a basic right basic to a reasonable trial† [316 U.S. 455 (1942)]. It set out the rule that the option to be spoken to by counsel isn't fundamental in state cases including non capital offenses with the exception of in extraordinary conditions. This decision was held later on after reactions, to apply just to the incompetents, for example, the ignorant people and retardates or to give alleviation in instances of legal maltreatment of intensity [316 U.S. 455 (1942)].  â â â â In Hamilton v. Alabama, the standard was in capital cases, the Court must delegate a direction for the litigant even without verification that respondent might be preferential without such arrangement or regardless of whether the litigant neglected to demand that one be named as his guidance [368 U.S. 52 (1961)].The â€Å"special conditions rule† was held to apply just in non capital offenses [368 U.S. 52 (1961)].  â â â â In the cases, Moore v. Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 (1957) and Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 350 (1963), the Court has set out the three classes which might be considered as biased and subsequently, requiring the arrangement of guidance, in particular: â€Å"(1) the individual qualities of the litigant which made it improbable he could get his very own satisfactory barrier, (2) the specialized intricacy of the charges or of potential protections to the charges, and (3) occasions happening at preliminary that raised issues of prejudice† (USGPO site, 2005).  â â â â The decision of the Court in the Betts case was upset in the milestone instance of Gideon v. Wainwright.  The Court in deserting the Betts thinking held that the privilege to help of insight is objective, essential and crucial and that the Fourteenth Amendment necessitates that the equivalent be accessible and appropriate in state courts. In 1972 this decision was held to apply to crime and genuine offense cases given that it conveyed a punishment of detainment [Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972)]. Furthermore, the Gideon administering was likewise held to apply to energetic guilty parties in adolescent wrongdoing case for the situation ofâ In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). What, if any association is there between this sacred issue and training?  â â â â The sacred issue of the privilege to help of direction is identified with training. The investigation of law requires information, aptitude and involvement with preliminary procedures. Indeed, even an informed and wise man who isn't appropriately taught and prepared in law is viewed as uncouth and unfit to guard himself. Courts are made to rebuff and deny the liable of their freedoms through detainment and other imposable punishments. Accordingly, it is basic that if an individual is accused of an offense in court he should have the option to put a safeguard and be heard by an appropriately prepared insight. To deny him of this would be equivalent to denying him of fair treatment and would render useless the fundamental principles of the Bill of Rights. An individual charged of an offense would require the mastery of an insight with the goal that he doesn't chance himself of being sentenced regardless of whether he be guiltless basically in light of the fact that he doesn't have the foggiest idea how to set up his guiltlessness. All the more so an uneducated man, a dim witted individual or an impoverished. Subsequently, it turns into the obligation of the court to name counsel so such individual may not be denied fair treatment.  References  Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972) Betts v. Brady and Progeny, 316 U.S. 455 (1942) Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 350 (1963) Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961) In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938) Moore v. Michigan, 355 U.S. 155 (1957) National Archives and Records Administration site. ‘Bill of rights.’ Retrieved on November 16, 2007, from http://www.archives.gov/national-documents understanding/sanctions/bill_of_rights.html Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Oxford University Press, 2005. Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932) U.S. Government Printing Office site. ‘Sixth correction: Rights of the blamed in criminal prosecutions† 2002. Recovered on November 16, 2007, from http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/pdf2002/024.pdf

Why Marijuana over Tobacco †English Persuasive Essay

Why Marijuana over Tobacco †English Persuasive Essay Free Online Research Papers Why Marijuana over Tobacco English Persuasive Essay Around 50 percent of approaching school first year recruits have confessed to utilizing weed. Furthermore, around 40 percent of them smoke it all the time. The inquiry is the reason is cannabis unlawful and tobacco lawful? Pot has been known as a â€Å"gateway drug†, which means it prompts utilization of other harder medications. This isn't correct. It genuinely relies upon the individual whether they will do other drugs. Individuals who smoke pot don't have a higher possibility of getting dependent or in any event, attempting cocaine or heroin than non-clients. Many negative realities have been recounted pot, generally by the tobacco business, which are bogus. For what reason is the tobacco business so worried about pot and its negative impacts? It is on the grounds that the tobacco business is attempting to remove a portion of the consideration from their item and blame maryjane. Pot is more beneficial, more secure, and has more clinical use than tobacco does. Most unlawful medications, for example, cocaine and heroin, are blended in with a wide range of synthetic compounds, yet not cannabis. Weed is developed starting from the earliest stage. No synthetic concoctions are included during or after the developing procedure, just daylight and water is required for the plant to develop. When the plant arrives at its pinnacle, it is brought down and hung up to dry for a significant stretch of time. After that it is fit to be delighted in and smoked by its clients. Be that as it may, in tobacco they blend in numerous unneeded hurtful synthetic concoctions. One of these synthetic compounds is nicotine, which is profoundly addictive. This is the substance that keeps the tobacco smokers returning for additional, and that's just the beginning, which keeps the tobacco organizations glad and generously compensated. You may ask, for what reason is this substance in tobacco? The explanation is simply so tobacco clients can't stop smoking when they attem pt, yet are stuck smoking until they kick the bucket. Today a huge number of little youngsters, teenagers, and grown-ups are dependent genuinely to tobacco but then it is difficult to turn out to be truly dependent on pot. Physical habit is the place the body thinks it needs the nicotine to endure, so when you simply stop the body isn't utilized to not having it in your framework and withdrawal indications may happen. At the point when one attempts to stop the utilization of tobacco items withdrawal side effects may happen including fast heartbeat, expanded hand tremor, sleep deprivation, sickness, physical tumults, nervousness, hallucinations, and seizures (Internet Mental Health). These side effects may happen for quite a long time subsequent to halting the utilization of tobacco. Additionally, tobacco likewise leaves radioactive materials in your lungs, which after some time is the thing that causes malignant growth (Erowid). No radioactive materials are available in weed smoke. The tar in pot smoke just contains 33% as much tar as t obacco (Erowid). Additionally when cannabis is smoked, it separates different tars in your lungs, including other maryjane and tobacco tars. Tobacco makes the lungs air entries littler and cause them to tighten, in contrast to weed. Persistent tobacco use causes the air section approaches to in the end close up making it difficult to breath. Also, at long last tobacco murder you. Another negative impact of nicotine is that it causes negative consequences for the heart and circulatory frameworks. What the nicotine does is makes the veins and corridors in your body choke (Erowid). This may prompt a stroke or respiratory failure. Tobacco use causes the body numerous issues. There has never been an overdose of maryjane. To overdose on pot you would need to smoke over a pound in an hour of great maryjane. That is truly unthinkable. This is genuine on the grounds that the dynamic substance in maryjane is THC. â€Å"THC is one of only a handful scarcely any synthetic compounds for which there is no known poisonous amount† (Lycaeum), which means substance of THC in weed isn't sufficiently high to cause passing. Tobacco, then again, can slaughter an individual by an overdose. Individuals have figured out how to overdose by utilizing dermal fixes and smoking tobacco simultaneously (Erowid). Nicotine is a perilous medication and ought not be utilized by any stretch of the imagination. Clinical maryjane has been utilized for a considerable length of time. It has been found as far back as 1,600 years prior. Cannabis was utilized for a wide range of reasons. Patients experiencing glaucoma may get pot to facilitate the agony in the eyes. For patients in chemotherapy maryjane has been utilized to give them their cravings back and diminish the queasiness (Erwoid). Individuals with extreme cerebral pains may likewise be recommended weed. Pot can be utilized on patients with dozing or dietary problems as well. However in many states it is illicit to try and recommend pot. Be that as it may, yet in 1988 our own DEA’s managerial Judge Frances Young stated, â€Å"Marijuana is one of the most secure restoratively dynamic substances known to man.† He likewise said â€Å"marijuana in its regular structure is far more secure than numerous nourishments we generally consume† (National Academy Press). Tobacco has no clinical uses by any stretch of the imaginati on. Some state it alleviates pressure and decreases the craving. Other than that, tobacco has no utilization of any sort whatsoever. Numerous individuals believe that cannabis makes you less shrewd. The biggest investigation of cannabis to date demonstrated that they are incorrect. It was demonstrated that substantial long haul clients scored somewhat higher on IQ tests, had a lower sickness rate, lower possibility of creating disease, and an expanded life expectancy contrasted with non-clients (Erowid). So smoking some weed before a test really will build your capacity to think. Truth be told, it said the cannabis smokers have been known to outlast non-smokers by as long as 2 years (Erowid). We have all heard that smoking cannabis causes Cancer. In addition to the fact that this is an untruth clients of weed have lower paces of creating lung malignancy then non-clients. â€Å"Not one instance of lung disease has ever been effectively connected to weed use† (Erowid). In 1975 scientists at the Medical College of Virginia found that cannabis can help battle against benevolent and threatening malignant growths. This demonstrates weed doesn't cause disease, yet it could forestall or even fix it. Shouldn't something be said about tobacco however? Tobacco causes lung malignant growth. Tobacco leaves tar in the lungs that are radioactive. These radioactive materials transform after some time into destructive materials that makes malignancy be delivered (Erowid). Cannabis is the main utilized unlawful medications. In the event that it isn't addictive, at that point for what reason do individuals who attempt it return? This is on the grounds that it is more secure than the various medications. Cannabis has been utilized everywhere throughout the world for some reasons. The Indians smoked it at functions to unwind and make some great memories. Where legitimate, specialists recommend it to their patients for various reasons. Some well known specialists and artists use cannabis all the time to improve their innovativeness. Others simply use it since they like to unwind and have a fabulous time. Nothing isn't right with smoking cannabis in any way, shape or form by any means, however utilizing tobacco is simply self destruction. What you have been told in the past may negate the realities about pot. Smoking tobacco has neither rhyme nor reason and should be halted. So don't simply remain there in the tobacco smoke occupied room and get out and smoke some maryjane. Research Papers on Why Marijuana over Tobacco - English Persuasive EssayUnreasonable Searches and SeizuresThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationThe Masque of the Red Death Room meaningsPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyDefinition of Export QuotasGenetic EngineeringBionic Assembly System: A New Concept of SelfThe Spring and AutumnPETSTEL examination of India

Having Children When Transgender

Having Children When Transgender Relationships LGBTQ Print Having Children When Transgender By Elizabeth Boskey, PhD facebook twitter linkedin Elizabeth Boskey, PhD, MPH, CHES, is a social worker, adjunct lecturer, and expert writer in the field of sexually transmitted diseases. Learn about our editorial policy Elizabeth Boskey, PhD Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Susan Olender, MD on September 15, 2017 Susan Olender, MD, is an assistant professor of medicine at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York City. Learn about our Medical Review Board Susan Olender, MD Updated on September 08, 2018 Dean Mitchell / Getty Images More in Relationships LGBTQ Spouses & Partners Violence and Abuse Individuals are considered to be transgender if their gender identity does not align with the sex they were assigned at birth. Many transgender individuals choose to socially or medically  transition  so that their gender presentation aligns with their gender identityâ€"socially transitioning usually involves dressing and presenting in a way that fits with the persons gender identity, while medically transitioning can involve taking cross-sex hormones, surgery, or both. Not all individuals choose to medically or surgically transition. However, those who do may face a dilemma: what do they do if they want to have children later in life? Both hormone treatments and surgery can impact fertility. Some surgeries, such as the removal of the ovaries or testes, will leave someone permanently infertile. Research has shown that around half of transgender adults regret their inability to have children after they transition. This has led to the recommendation that providers discuss fertility issues with all transgender people before they start to transition. However, that doesnt always happen. In addition, even when it does, the need to transition can be overwhelming enough to make other concerns seem unimportant. Thats particularly true for concerns such as fertility that may not be relevant until later in life. For some people, the inability to have their own genetic children is not an issueâ€"they may not be interested in having a family or they may want a family but not care about whether their children are biologically related to them. For others, however, the ability to have biological children is important to their long-term happiness. Thats where fertility preservation comes into play. For Transgender Men Transgender men  who transition after puberty have several options for fertility preservation. Specifically, individuals can undergo egg stimulation and harvestingâ€"similar to that for an IVF procedure. However, for many transgender men, this option can increase their dysphoriaâ€"their discomfort in their bodies. They may not feel comfortable taking large numbers of female hormones to stimulate their ovaries. In such cases, there is the possibility of ovarian tissue harvesting. However, it is less effective than ovarian stimulation. It is worth noting that transgender men who do not have bottom surgery can get pregnant. If they keep their ovaries and uterus, it is possible for them to experience a healthy pregnancy. However, in order to do so, they need to stop taking testosterone for the duration of the pregnancy. They also need access to either sperm or a fertilized ovum. For Transgender Women Fertility preservation for transgender women is easy  if it is done before they start taking estrogen. Sperm banking is relatively simple and affordable. However, for some women, the need to masturbate and ejaculate can be too dysphoric. For these women, its possible to either stimulate ejaculation electrically or to use surgery to harvest sperm directly from the testicles. For Transgender Adolescents When transgender adolescents are identified before puberty, it can be an incredibly positive thing for them. The standard of care has become using puberty blockers  to halt puberty until teenagers and their families are ready. Then either the teenager can start using cross-sex hormones or stop taking blockers to resume the puberty associated with the sex they were assigned at birth. Either way, the teenager only has to go through puberty once. They dont have to go through a puberty that may be upsetting or painful. They also are more likely to be able to conform to visible gender expectations as an adult. Unfortunately, the downside of puberty blockers is that transgender adolescents who take them have reproductive tracts that do not fully mature. That means that young transgender women cant provide sperm and young transgender men cant provide eggs. In order to do so, they would need to go further through the puberty that blockers are designed to prevent. There are some experimental options that have been pioneered in young cancer patients whose fertility is also often affected by medical treatment. Ovarian or testicular tissue can be harvested and frozen. Then, at a later date, it may be possible to use hormones to mature that tissue and provide viable eggs and sperm. The efficacy of these techniques is not something that young people can count on. However, it may be a worthwhile option for adolescents who think they might want to have children and  can afford the procedures. Transgender People as Parents A significant number of transgender people have children before they transition, particularly when they transition later in life. As a whole, their children are as happy and healthy as children of cisgender couples. Thats true for couples who divorce as well as couples who stay together. One of the biggest factors in childrens adjustment is whether their parents continue to have a good relationship. It is also often easier for children to adjust to a parents transition earlier in their life. No matter when a parent transitions, their whole family will likely benefit from support. Its a big change for the transgender parents  life, but also for the lives of those who love them. Seeking out resources such as family therapy with a transgender-affirming therapist, or transgender parenting support groups, can be incredibly helpful both in person or online.

Video Games And The Video Game Industry - 2174 Words

Video Games and the Video Game Industry The video game Pong was introduced in 1972 and can be considered the beginning of the video gaming industry. Unlike the game Pong, the controversies surrounding video games today are not quite as simple. Certain media outlets often portray video games to be bad for individual’s health and behaviour. There are still some people in the world that believe video games are contributing to the decline of today’s generation. However, video games and their industry are much more beneficial than they are perceived to be. Today the video gaming industry employs thousands of people worldwide. The video gaming industry has grown to support other industries. In the 21st century, the video game industry produces†¦show more content†¦Stories, visual art forms and music are contained in video games to help provide entertainment. There are few other mediums that utilize all of the art forms used in video games. Video games have been accepted as its own art form in modern societ y. Inside the Smithsonian American Art Museum there is a video game exhibit that showcases the progression of video games. More artists can thrive in today’s world now that a new art form exists. Video games have positively influenced our culture, for it allows artists to express themselves and inspire creativity in others. The video game industry has become a large contributor to the global economy. The creation of a video game requires collaboration from artists, musicians, authors and programmers. The effect of video games is not just local, but global as different companies from across the globe are involved in producing and distributing video games. Profits surrounding the video game industry are substantial in Canada and other countries. The video game industry adds 2.3 billion dollars to Canada’s GDP every year (Entertainment Software Association of Canada, 2014, p. 4). The result of this growing industry is more employment to develop and produce video games. The video gaming industry also employs those who play video games competitively. The competitive gaming environment is known as esports or electronic sports. There are several video games that are played and watched in a competitive

Corporate Social Responsibility Paper - 5866 Words

FINAL EXAM PAPER CSR and the Future of Corporate Accountability As is the case with most anything of any interest, the deeper you look into Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) the more difficult it is to define. And as long as it remains difficult to define, it will be difficult to communicate and enforce. Part of the difficulty lies in the fact that one is faced with a series of questions related to corporate social responsibility, human rights and the law along a parallel path of considering the importance of profits, business innovation and market share. Just what is the role of business as it pertains to social responsibility? Corporations are not in business to save the world. They are in business to make money. But what†¦show more content†¦Yet the very nature of CSR makes it difficult to draw clear lines between specific social programs and codes of conduct and these kinds of results. Business is all about measurement and goal setting. CSR, in so far as it attempts to effect behavior of both internal and external audiences, can be an elusive element to put into an Excel spreadsheet. It’s also something where change occurs over years, rather than over night. One may replace lighting fixtures in a warehouse to improve efficiency and reduce energy use as part of a policy of environmental stewardship which may be a part of a larger CSR program, but even then it can take months or even years to see that investment pay off in lower lighting bills and decreased energy usage. There is also an element of CSR that holds a negative measurement component. Effective CSR may PREVENT activities, so instead of measuring what happens, you need to look at what DOESN’T happen as a means of measuring success. For example, a successful safety and quality of life standard policy may prevent accidents and improve employee job satisfaction. But can you definitively state that either policy directly saved X lives or prevented YShow MoreRelatedCorporate Social Responsibility Group Paper1344 Words   |  6 Pages MGMT 2130 (Section 002) Corporate Social Responsibility Group Paper Brenda Lang Marisa Arnholtz, Kyla Mackie, Cassidy Makus October 19, 2015 â€Æ' Corporate Social Responsibility Group Paper In 1955, the McDonald’s franchise was established by Ray Kroc. Since then, it has been a growing success in the food and drink industry, directly and indirectly employing over 200,000 people throughout Canada. (McDonald’s, 2015, para. 2). McDonald’s is generating nearly $4.5 billion in the local annualRead MoreCorporate Social Responsibility Paper 2726 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿ Corporate Social Responsibility- MNGT 5990 A. List 5 outcomes that make Walmart a socially responsible company. 1. Giving back to the society: The Walmart Foundation gives back to the society by giving scholarships and contributing to charitable organizations worldwide. 2. Women’s empowerment: Walmart and the Walmart Foundation are providing training and career opportunities for nearly 1 million women worldwide. 3. Energy efficiency: Renewable energy sources account for 21% of Walmart’s electricityRead MoreSocial Responsibility And Business Ethics Essay1470 Words   |  6 Pagespurpose of this paper is to assess an article written by William Cohen (2009) which outlines Peter Drucker’s description of the role of social responsibility in business organizations and society. This paper will compare similarities and differences between Cohen’s perspective on social responsibility to the social responsibility and business ethics theories of Drucker and Milton Friedman. Furthermore, this paper will provide a frame of reference on corporate social responsibility and business ethicsRead MoreConcept Of Corporate Social Responsibility1723 Words   |  7 PagesSocial responsibility is an idea that has been of concern to mankind for many years. Over the last two decades, however, it has become of increasing concern to the business world. This has resulted in growing interaction b etween governments, businesses and society as a whole. In the past, businesses primarily concerned themselves with the economic results of their decisions. â€Å"Today, however, businesses must also reflect on the legal, ethical, moral and social consequences of their decisions† (AndersonRead MoreCorporate Social Responsibility Is A Hard Edged Business Decision1073 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Corporate social responsibility is a hard-edged business decision. Not because it is a nice thing to do or because people are forcing us to do it... because it is good for our business† (Fitzerald, n.d.). In view of the aforementioned citation, it dispenses an intuitive frame of reference into the purpose of this case assignment. As this paper will be expounding upon both the short and long-term ramifications of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Moreover, this case assignment will reviewRead MoreCorporate Social Responsibility On A Social Level1086 Words   |  5 PagesA bstract The purpose of this paper is to understand how a large progressive company operates in the corporate world as well as fulfills their corporate responsibility on a social level. While corporate responsibility is important, it is always viewed through the fiscal viability dimension of the maelstrom. The business case dominates the representation and operationalization of corporate responsibility. Due to the increased public sensitivity to corporate responsibility, the attitude has evolved fromRead MoreThe Concepts Of Csr And Financial Performance1450 Words   |  6 PagesTo measure the corporate social responsibilities and financial performance, the property and concept should be the first concern. This chapter aims to provide a detailed description of the concepts of CSR and financial performance. The framework and theories of CSR and financial performance are analyzed in the following sections. In addition, the measurement of corporate social performance and financial performance a re also discussed. 2.1 What is CSR? After more than one hundred years of improvementRead MoreThe Concept Of Corporate Social Responsibility Essay1696 Words   |  7 PagesConcept of Corporate Social Responsibility According to Pearce Robinson (2014), corporate social responsibility (CSR) is â€Å"the idea that business has a duty to serve society in general as well as the financial interests of stockholders.†(P.56) The concept of corporate social responsibility of the business operation must comply with sustainable development idea; the company should not only consider its own financial and operating conditions, but also think of its impacts on the social and environmentRead MoreChallenges in Implementing Csr1580 Words   |  7 PagesChallenges in implementing CSR Corporate Social Responsibility can be separate into internal dimension and external dimension. Internal dimension and external dimension Internal dimension focuses on organizational practices with respect to internal stakeholders that should be aligned to corporate social responsibility standards. It includes human resource management, safety and health, environmental impact and corporate change. External dimension focus on an organization practices towards externalRead MoreThe Ethical And Social Responsibilities Of Merck And Company1298 Words   |  6 Pagesgroundbreaking discoveries in developing medications. This paper will cover a scenario where Merck was considering the further development of a preexisting medication to treat patients with a mosquito transmitted worm larvae that thrives in the new host and reproduces within the host better known as river blindness. This paper will examine the corporate ethical and social responsibilities by evaluating the stakeholders, the Corporate Social Responsibility Pyramid, then organizational values, Stakeholder Impact

The War Of Northern Aggression Free Essays

Since the end of the American Civil War it has long been thought of as a war of freedom. The victorious Union declared that they were fighting to free the slaves in the South. However, in fact, the Civil War was actually a major breaking point in American History because it was really a power struggle between the old and the new. We will write a custom essay sample on The War Of Northern Aggression or any similar topic only for you Order Now The new, just as it had done in the previous generations, was replacing the old and was using so called â€Å"justice† as its spearhead. This division, based upon several distinct factors, led to conflict and sectionalism within the country and ultimately started a war. The Southern states eventually seceded from the Union because of differences in cultural expansion, political beliefs, and authority. Culturally, the South and the North were almost always at odds. However, it didn’t escalate into a serious matter until the admission of California and a growing interest in the West. This expansion created the question of whether or not slavery was allowed in the West, and although many people thought that the conflict was solved with the Missouri Compromise, they were sadly mistaken (just ask the Native Americans and how compromises worked out with them). The truth of the matter was that the majority of Northerners didn’t really care if the South had slaves or not in the beginning. Odds are that the institution of slavery would had died out anyhow with no need for a war. However, if the nation was expanding and growing into a respectable country around the world, slavery was what many people believed was holding America back. This created tensions between the North and the South which often led to violent encounters such as the raid on Harpers Ferry led by John Brown, as well as violent disputes in the West, particularly in Kansas, over popular sovereignty which eventually led to the nickname â€Å"Bleeding Kansas. † With industrialism circulating in the North and new ties being made between the North and the West due to advancements in railroads and transportation, along came with it a sense of superiority. The North was advancing along with the West, and the wicked South with all its impurities and old-fashioned traditions was holding the nation back. Although, what many Northerners couldn’t comprehend is that slavery was a necessary evil in the South. Slavery, along with technological advancements such as the cotton gin and short-staple cotton, were the main reasons for an influx of wealth in the region. In short, the livelihood of many Southerners was based on slavery and with the expansion in the West, and the question of slavery in the West, there was definite reason for Southerners to feel threatened. If people would fight to keep it contained then they would eventually fight to abolish it. In fact, in an excerpt from a speech given by Albert Brown he states that, â€Å"The Northerners hate us now, and they teach their children in their schools and churches to hate our children†¦. The John Brown raid, the burning of Texas, the stealthy tread of abolitionists among us, will tell the tale†¦. The North is accumulating power, and it means to use that power to emancipate your slaves (Doc 2).† This not only gives an example of how many Southerners felt threatened and infuriated but also shows the division of the country due to a prodding Northern agenda. Actually, in an excerpt from Jefferson Davis he said just that. He stated that, â€Å"Sectional hostility manifested in hostile legislation by states and raids of organized bodies sustained by Contributions†¦ of Northern Society furnish to us sufficient cause†, which basically means that Northern Society was backing Southern Society into a corner (Doc 7). Politically, the division between the two sections of the country was much greater than their already distant cultures. In fact, in the 1860 presidential election the popular vote was almost split right down the middle between the Northern Republican, Lincoln, and the Southern Democrat, Douglas. Not only was it divided in numbers but as well as the different sections of the country almost exactly (Doc 4). In fact, during the presidential campaign in 1860 the Republican party stated that, â€Å"we deny the authority of Congress, of a territorial legislature, or of any individuals, to give legal existence to slavery in any territory of the United States† whereas the Democratic party stated that, â€Å"all citizens of the United States have an equal right to settle with their property in the Territory, without their rights, either of person or property being impaired (Doc 1)†, ultimately showing the reader the different opinions held by each half of the country. This gradual disunion of the country and its politics eventually led to a series of events, including the repeal of the Missouri Compromise and such abolitionist literature as Uncle Tom’s Cabin, that started a war. In a passage written by George Templeton he reassured this when he said that, â€Å"we might have forgotten it had not Douglas undertaken to get Southern votes by repealing the Missouri Compromise. That was the final blow (Doc 5). † Despite the cultural and political differences of the war, to many people, it was about honor and integrity. The South felt as though the North had no right to tell it what it can and cannot do, and rightly so. Who were they to tell Southerners that after ages of building up their own Southern society and culture, they had to tear it down and conform to the rest of the country and its own beliefs and practices? In theory, the real reason behind the war was authority, and who exactly had it. Whether or not it was the pressure from the Federal Government to take control, or it was the states themselves who craved freedom from the government, or a combination of both didn’t matter because it was too far-gone at that point. However, the truth of the matter was summed up by a quotation from the Pittsburgh Press when it stated that, â€Å"The Republicans claim the right to make a code of laws for the South, not only in the States, but in the Territories (Doc 3).† This gives us the basis for what the war was truly about, which was the right to protect oneself and their way of life. So in conclusion, the Southern states seceded due to large differences in culture, politics, and faulty authority. This gave way to one of the bloodiest wars this country has ever seen with over half a million deaths on its own soil between its own countrymen. This tragedy led to resentment between both sections of the country, but allowed for the reestablishment of the Union to commence, giving way to the foundation of our present, somewhat unified country. How to cite The War Of Northern Aggression, Essays

Paradise Lost By Milton Essays (709 words) - Bereshit, Adam And Eve

Paradise Lost By Milton In John Milton's epic poem Paradise Lost , the issue of who is to blame for the fall of man is one that for the most part can be interpreted from a close reading of book IX. Based on the text, Eve played a larger role in the decision to eat the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, and Adam's role was more passive in that he simply followed the wishes of Eve. When everything is sorted out later in the story, it becomes clear that Adam and Eve were equally at fault for their actions. After an extended visit from the angel Raphael at which time he explained in great detail to Adam the dangers of falling into temptation and disobeying God's will, Adam is faced with a problem. The problem is that Eve wants to split up for the day and Adam knows that this is a bad idea, particularly after the dream that she has described to him. They argue at great length, but in the end Adam allows Eve to do as she wishes even though he knows she is making a very bad decision. Adam also knows that his ability to reason is inherently stronger than Eve's, yet in his love for her is so strong that consents to her will. This yielding is very similar to Eve?s yielding to the serpent?s deception because Adam is aware of the probable outcome of this decision. In his final plea for her to remain pious he says to Eve: O woman, best are all things as well Of God ordained them; his creating hand Nothing imperfect of deficient left Of all he had created, much less man, Or aught that might his happy state secure, Secure with outward force. Within himself The danger lies, yet lies within his power; Against his will he can receive no harm. But God left free the will, for what obeys Reason is free, and reason he made right, But bid her well, and still erect, Lest by some by fair appearing good surprised, She dictate false and misinform the will To what God expressly hath forbid. Not then mistrust, but tender love, enjoins That I should mind thee oft, and mind thou me. Firm we subsist, yet possible to swerve, Since reason not impossibly may meet some specious object by the foe suborned, And fall into deception unaware, Not keeping strictest watch, as she was warned. Seek not Temptation, then which not to avoid Were better, and most likely if from me Thou sever not: trial will come unsought. Wouldest thou approve thou constancy, approve First thy obedience, th'other who can know, Not seeing thee attempted, who attest? But if thou think trial unsought may find Us both securer than thus warned thou seem?st, Go; for thy stay, not free, absents thee more. Go in thy native innocence; rely On what thou hast of virtue, summon all; For God towards thee hath done his part: do thine.(9,343-379) In this long speach Adam is pleading with Eve to see that is is a terrible idea for her to venture out into the garden alone in the mist of such impending danger. It is as though he is giving her a speach before he sends her out to battle. Battle is precisely what she walks into, and Adam is clearly aware that this is going to happen. It is his decision to yield to Eve that makes him as much to blame for the fall as Eve is for trusting the serpent and falling into temptation. After Eve has been corrupted she is faced with a decision of what to do about Adam. She decides to convince him to eat the apple as well so that they will share what ever punishment that they will have coming to them. Adam knows that eating the apple is very wrong, but he does so anyway because his love for Eve is so strong will not let her suffer punishment alone. This being his decision, he eats the apple and thus disobeys the word of God and contradicts every thing he has been telling Eve that they must believe in. After the deed is done, they fall into a terrible argument of who is to blame, but the reality is that the two of the are equally at fault for the fall of man, because either could have prevented it if they had obeyed the will of God.